The Atlantic wrote an article about the top 10 food stories of 2010. It covers a wide range of topics, but food safety is a prominent issue. I found the links to articles about Jack DeCoster shocking, but not surprising. Foraging is also becoming popular. It’s like having nature do the gardening for you. I would love to try foraging, but I need to find an expert to show me the ropes first. (And I’ve heard foragers are notoriously protective of their ‘spots.’)
And my favorite quote from an article on cleaning up Chesapeake Bay pollution.
“…it is unfair to expect New York to dedicate taxpayer dollars, staff, and other…resources to reduce [pollution] to the bay when New York reaps no benefit from the bay.” It’s hard to tell in written form, but do I detect major whining? Is it unfair that we get to eat food from places we don’t live?
Not to paint New York in negativity only, Governer Paterson of NY is passing an executive order to increase the amount of local food the state purchases. “…where feasible and without increased cost or burden, state-supported institutions must increase the proportion of their total food purchases composed of locally grown food.” Cost is the driving factor in so many decisions. I can’t help but wonder if they spent more on local food even when there was a slight increase in cost, they might find that they save money in other areas. And what about all the benefits that can’t be listed on a balance sheet? Still, it’s a great step forward.
To combat childhood obesity, San Francisco has effectively banned the Happy Meal. The city’s Board unanimously passed the “Healthy Foods Initiative Ordinance,” placing nutritional requirements on meals that come with toys.
“The intent of this Ordinance is to improve the health of children and adolescents in San Francisco by setting healthy nutritional standards for children’s meals sold at restaurants accompanied by toys or other incentive items. These standards will support families seeking health eating choices for their children by permitting restaurants to offer toys and other incentive items only in conjunction with foods meeting specified nutritional criteria.”
Since “San Franciscans consumer over one-third of their food…at fast food and pizza restaurants,” this would likely have a significant positive impact if: 1) people that were buying Happy Meals continue to do so, and 2) the imposed guidelines actually translate into healthier food. Having spent a year in the Bay area, I confess I was tempted to consume all my meals at restaurants, but nary a McDonald’s meal entered my mind. Haven’t corporations become adept at finding a way around rules? Perhaps parents will now buy two Happy Meals for their children because of the calorie cap? And customers must now salt their own fries? Critics claim that it should be up to the parents to guide their children’s food choices. An occasional fast food meal (toy or no toy) does not negate a healthy diet. At the same time, consumers are constantly bombarded with advertising convincing children and their parents to choose fast food.
Nourishing Thoughts has a post about the inherent flaw of having companies self-police their advertising. It’s also a great resource for raising healthy kids.